(StraightShooterNews.com) – American patriots are pleased that President Donald Trump slammed radical left lunatic judge James Boasberg after his controversial ruling halted deportations of alleged gang members.
Watch the video below.
The standoff highlights the ongoing battle between Trump’s decisive action on illegal immigration and activist judges who prioritize criminals’ rights over American safety.
The confrontation escalated when Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts made a rare public statement defending the judge.
The President did not mince words when he took to Truth Social to blast Boasberg as a “Radical Left Lunatic Judge” who overstepped his authority.
The judge halted deportation flights of alleged gang members that were authorized under the Alien Enemies Act, a wartime power that allows the deportation of noncitizens without court hearings.
This law has not been widely used since World War II but remains a powerful tool that the Trump administration leveraged to remove dangerous criminal elements from American communities.
Trump’s frustration was palpable as he questioned the very foundation of presidential authority.
“If a President doesn’t have the right to throw murderers, and other criminals, out of our Country because a Radical Left Lunatic Judge wants to assume the role of President, then our Country is in very big trouble, and destined to fail!” Trump warned.
Moreover, the confrontation intensified when Representative Brandon Gill (R-TX) filed articles of impeachment against Judge Boasberg.
This bold move underscores the seriousness with which Trump and his supporters view judicial obstruction of legitimate executive actions on immigration enforcement.
The impeachment effort, while facing an uphill battle in the current Congress, sends a strong message about accountability for judges who seemingly prioritize the rights of criminal aliens over the safety of American citizens.
“Many people have called for his impeachment, the impeachment of this judge. I don’t know who the judge is, but he’s radical left,” Trump claimed.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts stepped into the fray with a statement that many viewed as a rebuke to Trump, saying:
“For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”
This rare public intervention by the Chief Justice highlights the growing tensions between the judiciary and executive branches.
Trump quickly noted that Roberts’ statement did not mention him by name, effectively dismissing the implied criticism.
Conservative legal experts have defended the impeachment push, noting that the Constitution explicitly provides this congressional power as a check against judicial overreach.
Attorney Mike Davis and Representative Andrew Clyde (R-GA) both emphasized that impeachment is a legitimate constitutional remedy when judges exceed their authority or make politically motivated rulings that endanger Americans.
While impeachment would require a simple majority in the House and a two-thirds majority in the Senate, making it unlikely in the current political landscape, the debate shows fundamental questions about judicial accountability.
Ultimately, the White House has denied non-compliance with Boasberg’s ruling after deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members, creating further confusion about the administration’s stance.
In a Fox News interview, Trump acknowledged the limits of defying court orders but criticized “rogue judges” who substitute their political preferences for the law.
For many Americans concerned about border security and rising crime rates associated with illegal immigration, Trump’s forceful response represents a necessary pushback against judicial activism that hampers effective law enforcement and border control.
Copyright 2025, StraightShooterNews.com
